Skip to main content

Bada bhai Mukesh's (Jio's) dream gives chhota bhai Anil (Rcom ) the nightmares

There is a new twist in the love-hate story of India's most famous brothers — Mukesh and Anil Ambani. Even though the brothers aren't bitter rivals anymore, they are again locked in an indirect fight tilted heavily against the younger brother, Anil. 

Elder brother Mukesh's company Reliance Jio, which has shaken the telecom market with its aggressive entry last year, has ended up giving a big blow to Anil's company, Reliance Communications. 

Hit by Reliance Jio’s free offers and disruptive pricing in the telecom industry, Reliance Communications posted a few days ago its first year loss since its inception of Rs 1,285 crore for fiscal gone by, compared to a net profit of Rs 660 crore when compared on a like-to-like basis. It posted a consolidated net loss of Rs 966 crore for the fiscal ended fourth quarter compared to a net profit of Rs 90 crore in the same period last year. 

The company blamed the crisis in the industry, hyper competition, free offers and disruptive pricing. Behind all these factors is elder Ambani's company, Reliance Jio. 

Last year, it seemed the brothers would soon band. A decade after the Ambani brothers split, Anil announced that his telecom company had “virtually” merged with Mukesh's Reliance Jio. 

“As far as our 100 million customers are concerned, as far as our 1 million retailers are concerned, as far as our employees are concerned, and as far as our vendors and partners are concerned, there has already been a virtual merger of the two organisations (RCom and Jio),” Ambani had told shareholder .. 

There are two committed brothers—Mukesh Ambani and Anil Ambani—both working relentlessly to fulfil the dream of Dhirubhai Ambani,” Anil had said. 

But the elder brother was not so forthcoming. In an interview to ET a few weeks ago, Mukesh had said he was “happy” that the two brothers had overcome all their past issues at the family level, but added that their businesses were separate. The elder brother had said Jio would work with all the players in the industry, including RCom, number of mutually beneficial areas. 

A few days ago, when Reliance Communication declared its result, an altogether different picture emerged: Bada bhai's ambitious dream to capture the telecom market was giving nightmares to the chhota bhai. 

Reliance Communication is in a bigger trouble: It has defaulted on its loan servicing obligations with more than 10 local banks, some of whom have categorised the exposure as "special mention account" in their asset books. 

Now, its survival depends on two moves: selling half of its wireless telecoms business to Aircel and 51 per cent of its towers unit to Canada's Brookfield. 

According to Reuters, these deals will reduce net debt by more than half to about $3 billion but will not close until a dispute relating to Aircel's ultimate backer, Malaysian tycoon Ananda Krishnan, is resolved. Lenders must consent too. RCom also plans to sell properties, but it is unclear if the group's remaining subsea cable and enterprise business can comfortably service the leftover debt. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wizard of Dalal Street: Govind Parikh's investment mantra

Wizard of Dalal Street: Govind Parikh's investment mantra Govind Parikh of Govind Parikh Securities says selling right is more important than correct buying. He says it is necessary to keep a lot of cash. "We keep an average 10 percent cash in our portfolio," he says I like to buy things in a bad market. Additionally, don't look current cash flow, concentrate on future cash flows — that is what  I look at," says Govind Parikh of Govind Parikh Securities. He advises investors to buy good quality stocks when the market crashes. While sharing his investment philosophy with ace investor Ramesh Damani, on the Wizards of Dalal Street, Parikh says management integrity is very important when deciding which stock to bet on. He tells investors not to buy stocks impulsively. According to him, selling right is more important than correct buying. He says it is necessary to keep a lot of cash. "We keep an average 10 percent cash in our portfolio," he says. He al...

IT giants beat the sTREET

  and HCL Technologies, to do an encore in their December 2013 quarter earnings. All three companies also exuded confidence about the future demand environment. N Chandrasekaran, chief executive officer & managing director of TCS, said he believed next year would be a stronger one than 2013-14, as customers executed their business plans in a relatively stable environment. HCL Technologies Chief Financial Officer Anil Chanana said the deal pipeline looked significantly better. “We won 15 large deals in this quarter — about half of them in the IMS (infrastructure management services) space. We remain confident of the growth ahead as client budgets remain stable”. Infosys had also improved its revenue guidance for the financial year from 9-10 per cent to 11.5-12 per cent. For the December 2013 quarter, TCS’ revenues grew 32.5 per cent to Rs 21,294 crore and net profit stood at Rs 5,314 crore, up 49.6 per cent from that in the year-ago period. For Infosys and H...

Was Narender Modi a risk Worth Taking .......

Three years ago, I took a risk and voted for BJP for the first time. And today I ask myself, was it a risk worth taking? At the time, I had been worried that India had a narrow window of opportunity called the 'demographic dividend'. If we elected the right candidate, prosperity would enter crores of lives, and in course of time India might become a middle-class country. Our opportunity came from being uniquely young; if those in the productive age got jobs, there would be gains in prosperity fa r outweighing the burden of supporting the old and the very young. This window would close in a dozen or so years as India would also begin to age. As I evaluated the candidates, I concluded that Narendra Modi offered the best chance of harvesting the demographic dividend.   I was aware of the risks -Modi was polarising, sectarian and authoritarian. But I felt the risk in not voting for him was greater. If India failed to create enough jobs, we would sacrifice another generation. I ...